The Author was first tasked with trying to collect money.
There was a hierarchy of payors, or more properly, a list of better positioned
suckers. Collecting money to pay for patient care was a game to find other
people to pay for healthcare. For all this talk about “personal responsibility,”
and keeping “gubmint” out of healthcare, Americans have an entitlement view of
healthcare. It goes like this:
A. Insurance,
which employers, or former employers, should pay for, must pay the healthcare bills.
That system worked well until about 1980, when the unexplained “decoupling” of
American healthcare costs from the rest of the developing world began. Before
1980, US healthcare costs were on the high end of the healthcare costs paid by
other countries, but moved in the same curve as our world partners. But
something happened in 1980 that ran the train off the tracks. US healthcare costs
decoupled and began dramatic rises. The graphs on the linked sources,
demonstrate this “decoupling”, as the Author calls it.
So in collecting money, the Author discovered, that you worked the hierarchy, hoping to avoid the last resort, the patient himself. And one can understand the natural desire to stick someone else with the bills for the bills that most Americans still see as a god-given entitlement.
WHAT IS IT THAT THE STATE OF INDIANA DOESN’T GET ABOUT
HEALTHCARE?
In the next installment of this article, the Author will
take a look at Indiana’s decision not to expand Medicaid, a decision that the
Author believes may be reversed.
No comments:
Post a Comment